Ewe 2: a case study

Tutorial CaseThe CaseDiscussion BoardKnowledge Acquistion

Tutorial Case Teacher ToolboxContent Standards
bar2.gif (55 bytes)

In their 1997 year in review, CNN reports "the sheep hit the fan." Several days later, Dr. Richard Seed proclaims "What we intend to do is basically duplicate in humans what was done by Scottish researchers in sheep." {Video}

How do you decide?You will be exploring the scientific and ethical impacts of cloning on individuals, families, and society. You will use a case study approach in which you will grapple, chew on and ponder the many issues and perspectives involved in both partial and whole body cloning of humans.  You will carefully craft an action plan, and develop a set of possible consequences. However, the buck doesn't stop in the classroom.   Real-life issues demand a real-life audience, so your last task will be to share your beliefs on cloning with the world. Big projects need a plan, and here is the process you will follow to complete your quest.

SURVEY

Access the on-line survey, and respond to the questions from your own perspective.  Please be honest with yourself.  No one else will know how you answered the questions. Make sure you select the correct survey.

Click Here to take the pre-survey 

Community Response

Print one copy of the survey. Give the survey to a non-family member over the age of 25 in your local community. Explain to the individual that it is a class project, and thank them for taking the time to fill in the survey.  If they want to log-on to the survey and fill in the form on-line, that would be great.

After your community member has returned their survey, please go back the on-line survey and fill in the form.   Make sure you select the correct survey.

Click Here to take the community survey 

ISSUES

Cloning is a complex issue. The ability to get past a personal opinion, and identify the core questions is often overlooked when solving a complex problem. Taking the time to get down to the key issues will ultimately result in a solution that will be meaningful to each person with a stake in the final decision.

What are the issues?

Individually read Exploring the Undiscovered Country: A Learning Case on Cloning.   Identify a minimum of three key issues involved in the scenario. Don't worry about fixing the problem at this stage; just identify the key questions.

To get a better idea of how to identify issues, you may want to take a glance at the "Identifying Issues Rubric."

Get into your work group and share the issues that each person has identified. Create a group list of between 3 to 5 common issues that were identified by the group.  Print a copy of your issues and place it in your group portfolio.

PERSPECTIVES

Each character in the case brings their own perspective to the issues involved. Now it’s time to see if you can learn anything by looking at the issues from these different perspectives. This means you will make up or identify the roles of the people who are involved in this situation. Of course you will consider Dr. Osgood, Gerrard, and the old man in the story, but don’t forget the outside factors whose values influence the situation.

Look at the perspectives.

As a group, list both the characters in the scenario, and any outside stakeholders. Write a description of their perspective on the case. Print a copy of your perspectives and place it in your group portfolio.

To get a handle on how to identify perspectives, you may want to take a quick glance at the "Identifying Perspectives Rubric."

TELECOLLABORATION: ISSUES & PERSPECTIVES

How do others view the case? What can you learn from their discussion about the issues and perspectives. It is time to collaborate with your peers in another class.

As a group, log-on to the on-line discussion board. Post your group's issues and perspectives.   Make sure you place your work in the correct group location. You will be creating a new thread.

After your corresponding distant partners have posted their issues and perspectives, reply to the discussion board by identifying one issue or perspective that you do not fully agree with and explain your group’s reason for not including it on your list.  Print a copy of your reply and place it in your group project portfolio.

CONSTRUCTING KNOWLEDGE

During this phase, you will use the perspectives you identified to gather more information. This is your chance to get into the minds, bodies, and hearts of the various viewpoints involved in the issues.

How do you get to know?

Each member of your group will select a different perspective in the story.  At least one person in the group must select an outside stakeholder; A person or organization that is not directly mentioned in the story.  Your job is to craft three quality questions that will assist you in really getting a feel for your chosen perspective.  After crafting your questions, you will use internet and/or library resources to answer the questions.  To help you with your questioning technique, a chart has been created to guide you.  Each of your questions must contain a word from a different word list pool. 

Word List

Pool 1 Pool 2 Pool 3
Distinguish
Summarize
Illustrate
Extend
Interpret
Defend
Express
Support
Criticize
Recommend
Compare
Judge
Appraise
Organize
Construct
Compose
Hypothesize
Organize
Survey
Infer
Point out
Categorize

Complete the Perspective Report Form

Use the internet resources in the knowledge base to locate at least two artifacts that will assist you in answering the support questions that you identified in the Perspective Report Form.  

You must fill in the Reference Evaluation Form for each artifact. 

Place a copy of your Perspective Report, answers, artifacts, and evaluation forms in your individual (not group) project portfolio. 

ACTIONS/CONSEQUENCES

Action: Now comes the time to create the best "happy ending" for the story. Do this by getting together as a group and sharing the best solution from each perspective. Then discuss, debate, and support the issues and values using the knowledge you've learned along the way. Remember, evidence is more persuasive than volume or tantrums. Specifically, consider the main issues raised by the situation, what each person on your team learned by looking and learning from a certain perspective, and how things are to be worked out so that no one's values get ignored. 

 Time to take a stand.

Consequence: Based on the Actions you proposed, what will happen? This is an educated guess, not an outright guess, because of all you learned about the values that lie at the foundation of each perspective.  If you've thought it out fully, you should be able to suggest a likely outcome. These will vary of course because each group used different brains and Web sites to create their understanding.

What will happen if your action plan is applied?

Group Action/Consequence Activity

Your group's goal is to write scene 4 - Two Years Later.  Speculate on the life of one of the characters that appeared in scenes 1-3.  You may have other characters appear with cameo roles.  Focus on the action taken from one perspective and the resulting consequences of the character's action.  It's a good idea to take the time to study how your scene might be graded.   Here is one possible scoring rubric.  Place a copy of your scene in your group portfolio.

After writing scene four, it's time for your group to share the scene with a group of students in another school.  There are two ways to accomplish this task.  See your instructor for more instructions.

  • Videoconference with a group from another school.
  • Post your results on the discussion board.

Personal Action/Consequence

Your final responsibility will be to share your personal perspective on cloning.  This will give you the opportunity to receive feedback from an expert that has not been part of the project.   Before you start writing, check out one possible grading rubric.

Express yourself

  1. First, you must find a contact.  You may remember an email contact in one of your research artifacts.   You might want to surf through the resources again, and look for an email contact. Your group might also consider sending your recommendations to a government official.  You can find a list of email addresses at:

  2. Fill out the Take A Personal Stand Worksheet, and place a copy of the report in your individual portfolio.

  3. Use your Take A Personal Stand Worksheet to craft an email message to your contact.  Be sure that your email letter provides your contact with the background information they will need to understand your recommendations.  In addition, be sure to tell your contact that you are seeking feedback. This is a "real-world" assignment.  The person receiving your email may have deep feelings about the topic of cloning, so you need to make sure your letter demonstrates a high level of respect.

  4. Make sure that all the members in your group have proof read the email message before sending it.

  5. Send your email.  Make sure that you 'cc' (carbon copy) your teacher, so that he or she has a copy of your work.

POST SURVEY

In doing Ewe 2, You have been exposed to the controversies surrounding cloning.  Have your beliefs changed?   Access the on-line survey, and respond to the questions from your own perspective.  Make sure you are responding to the post survey. Please be honest with yourself.  No one else will know how you answered the questions.

Survey Name: Cloning Student Post-Survey
Password: ewe2

Congratulations! You have successfully navigated a long learning journey.  You have generated your own questions, sought the answers, and taken a stand on a complex issue. However, the most important learning you may have gained from this adventure may be a new method in problem solving.

I always live without knowing. That is easy. How you get to know is what I want to know."

~Richard P. Feyman

 

 

Ewe 2: A Case Study
launched March '99, last updated March '99
copyright © 1999
all rights reserved

Sponsors:
San Diego County Office Of Education
California Technology Assistance Program
Pacific Bell
Contact Information